Does CEO Background Predict PE Exit Success?
We analyzed 47,643 CEO appointments across PE-backed companies. The answer may surprise the industry: resume pedigree has negligible predictive value for exit outcomes.
Co-authored with HSiQ Talent Intelligence (Hunt Scanlon)
Executive Summary
Private equity firms invest enormous resources in CEO credential screening. Search firms build shortlists around MBA programs, FAANG tenure, MBB consulting backgrounds, and elite banking pedigree. The implicit assumption: these credentials predict who will successfully navigate a PE-backed company to a profitable exit.
Verata's research team tested this assumption rigorously. We analyzed 47,643 CEO appointment records, filtering to 12,174 eligible cases—non-founders, non-current appointments with a 7-year fixed-horizon observation window to eliminate right-censoring bias. The baseline positive exit rate across this sample was 34.6%.
The results challenge conventional wisdom. Of 22 CEO background traits tested with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction, only 4 survive statistical significance—and their effect sizes are negligible. The best machine learning model achieves an AUC of just 0.562, barely above random chance (0.500).
In other words: the resume traits that PE firms screen most heavily for—MBA, FAANG, MBB, elite banking, elite undergrad—have no meaningful predictive value for whether a CEO will lead a PE-backed company to a successful exit.
Exit Rates by CEO Background Trait
“The best machine learning model achieves an AUC of 0.562—barely above random chance (0.500). If algorithms can't predict exit success from resumes, humans certainly can't.”
Key Findings
Resume Pedigree Fails
MBA, FAANG, MBB, elite banking, elite undergrad all fail to significantly predict exits.
None of the “pedigree” traits (MBA, FAANG, MBB, elite banking, elite undergrad) survive FDR-corrected statistical testing. FAANG experience is actually associated with lower exit rates (31.1% vs 34.7%).
Only 2 Traits Survive
Of 22 traits tested, only general management background and years of experience survive the full robustness gauntlet (FDR + era-robustness + temporal validation).
Effect sizes remain tiny. And with 65% prevalence among hired CEOs, general management is a seniority proxy—not a differentiating credential.
CEO Identity Explains <7%
Within-person analysis of 1,017 repeat CEOs shows ICC of 6.82%.
The same CEO gets different outcomes across appointments. Success is driven by situational factors—deal structure, market timing, board relationships, and operational support.
Odds Ratios: CEO Traits vs. Exit Success (FDR-Corrected)
Methodology
This study employs a comprehensive statistical framework designed to minimize false discoveries and ensure temporal validity.
Sample Size
47,643 appointments filtered to 12,174 eligible. 7-year fixed-horizon outcomes eliminate right-censoring bias.
FDR Correction
Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction applied to all 22 simultaneous hypothesis tests.
Temporal Validation
Train on pre-2015 data, test on 2015-2018. Best temporal AUC: 0.523.
Survival Analysis
Cox proportional hazards with CV-selected penalizer. Proper censoring at last-known-alive date.
Causal Inference
Propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, and augmented IPW to address selection bias.
Within-Person Controls
Fixed effects analysis of 1,017 repeat CEOs across 2,172 appointments. ICC = 6.82%.
What This Means for PE Firms
If resumes can't predict CEO success, PE firms need a fundamentally different approach to executive diligence.
Stop Screening, Start Listening
Credential screening gives PE firms false confidence. Backchannel references from people who've actually worked with a candidate reveal leadership behaviors, cultural fit, and board dynamics that no resume can capture.
Relationships > Resumes
The research shows CEO success is driven by contextual factors—board relationships, cultural fit, support networks. Understanding these requires relationship intelligence, not keyword matching.
Invest in Relationship Intelligence
Verata maps career overlaps across 40M+ professionals, enabling PE firms to discover backchannel references, identify shared-tenure connections, and make hiring decisions based on relationship-based evidence.
Learn about Talent SolutionsGet the Full Research Report
Download the complete analysis—co-authored with HSiQ Talent Intelligence (Hunt Scanlon)—with detailed methodology, full statistical tables, and actionable recommendations for your firm.
By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We'll also send you a link to schedule a walkthrough with our research team.
Research Insights Series
Explore the 24-part series that unpacks each key finding from this research — from the flagship “less than 1%” finding to actionable steps for fixing CEO selection.
Related Research Guides
CEO Traits and PE Exit Outcomes
A deep dive into which CEO characteristics correlate with successful private equity exits and which are just noise.
ResearchDo MBAs Make Better PE CEOs?
Examining the evidence on whether MBA credentials predict CEO performance in PE-backed companies.
ResearchDoes Elite Pedigree Drive PE Returns?
FAANG, MBB, elite banking, Ivy League — do elite credentials predict better outcomes for PE portfolio companies?
ResearchWhat Actually Predicts PE CEO Success?
If resumes don't predict outcomes, what does? Exploring the contextual and relational factors that drive PE CEO performance.
ResearchThe Case for Backchannel Executive Diligence
Why relationship-based references outperform credential screening in predicting executive success at PE-backed companies.
See How Relationship Intelligence Transforms Executive Diligence
Verata helps PE firms make better hiring decisions by revealing the relationships and references that resumes can't.